AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
3m dual ended combat arms earplugs11/13/2022 ![]() In the beginning, the earplugs were too big to fit into their carrying cases, which made them difficult for military members to carry easily. The other side reduced extremely loud noises, such as explosions and gunfire, while still allowing users to hear quieter sounds. Understanding the problem with 3M earplugsĪearo designed the Combat Arms earplugs to be adjustable for military members. government that the earplugs were defective, falsified safety test results, and failed to include proper instructions or warnings about using the earplugs. The claims further allege that 3M did not tell the U.S. The ongoing lawsuits center on the allegations that 3M was aware of problems with the earplugs but entered into this exclusive contract with the federal government anyway. The earplugs were part of standard-issue equipment for members in all four branches of the military for well over a decade. As a result, 3M is responsible for the earplugs developed and distributed before and after 2008.ģM had an exclusive contract with the Defense Logistics Agency, the federal agency that provides the military with necessary supplies. Aearo was the company that developed the Combat Arms earplugs. In 2008, Minnesota-based 3M bought a company called Aearo Technologies. These verdicts show the value of 3M earplug lawsuit claims, as well as the potential for a successful outcome in similar claims against 3M in the future. It is the second verdict in favor of an injured veteran, with the first being $7.1 million awarded in favor of three injured service members in April 2021. The Baker case is only the third-of potentially thousands-of injury cases concerning 3M military earplugs to go to trial. However, the jury found 3M to be only 62% at fault for the injuries, which reduced the damage award for Baker to $1.1 million. The jury found that 3M failed to provide sufficient safety warnings for its earplugs, which the company designed specifically for military personnel in combat. In June 2021, a Florida jury awarded a $1.7 million verdict to Lloyd Baker, a soldier who suffered hearing damage after using 3M military earplugs during his military service. #3M DUAL ENDED COMBAT ARMS EARPLUGS UPDATE#2021 update for 3M earplug lawsuit: $1.7M award If you are among those servicemen and women who suffered injuries due to the use of faulty earplugs, you may qualify for compensation through a 3M military earplugs lawsuit. However, the Combat Arms Earplugs, Version 2 (CAEv2) that 3M provided were defective, leading to hearing damage for thousands of military members. military and experienced damage to your hearing, you may be eligible to join a mass tort against the manufacturer.īetween 20, the federal government contracted with the manufacturer 3M to provide hearing protection to all four military branches. If you used 3M dual-ended Combat Arms earplugs while serving in the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |